Walk into most social media teams and you will see a familiar pattern. A lot of the faces are women. Many of the people running brand accounts, managing communities and making content are women. Men do hold social media roles and lead social teams, but the discipline as a whole leans female in a way that is hard to miss.
At the same time, social media roles sit in a strange place inside marketing. The work is highly visible and often high stakes, yet it is still common to see social and community jobs banded at the lower end of pay scales or written as long lists of responsibilities without real decision making power. On a day dedicated to women's experiences at work, it is worth asking how that gap opened up and what it would look like to close it.
The numbers: women are everywhere, the pay gap is too
Start with the broader picture. Across marketing as a whole, women now outnumber men in many regions. Industry surveys in North America suggest women hold a majority of marketing roles and just over half of CMO jobs at major advertisers. Marketing is one of the few corporate functions where you can say women are both doing the work and, on paper, often leading it.
The pay story does not match that pattern. In the UK, recent data shows a marketing gender pay gap of around 18 percent, meaning female marketers earn, on average, about 82 pence for every pound earned by male peers. In martech and related roles, one 2024 survey found men earning roughly 35 percent more than women overall, up from a 24 percent gap in the previous year. The national median gender pay gap across all UK employees now sits a few points lower than that, which means marketing, despite its progressive image, is lagging the labour market on pay equity.
Zoom in on digital and leadership titles and the trend repeats. At UK SEO agencies, women hold just over half of jobs but less than a quarter of C‑suite roles. In that sample, the most common job title for women is "Account Manager", while the most common for men is "Managing Director". Women are present and often numerically dominant, but the pattern shows a long step between holding the work and holding the power.
From "someone should post" to a feminised discipline
Social media did not arrive in companies as a fully funded channel with a clear strategy. In many teams it started as a side task. Someone needed to post on Facebook. Someone needed to reply on Twitter. That someone was often the youngest person in the room, the assistant, the person already handling admin, content, PR or customer service. Often, that person was a woman.
Those early decisions shaped the role. Instead of recruiting senior specialists with budget and authority, many brands handed social to existing staff "on top of" their main job. Social was described as an extension of work women were already expected to do: communication, care, aesthetics, calming people down, keeping the tone right. Over time, a pattern set in where women were disproportionately represented in social and community roles and those roles were treated as an elastic resource rather than a defined, protected function.
The labour itself is gendered too. Social media management is built on skills that do not always show up in a job spec. Reading the room. Anticipating backlash. Taking abuse in the comments without reacting in kind. Being the one who wakes up in the night to check whether a scheduled post has landed badly. Global research on work still finds that emotional and relational labour is more likely to be expected of women, both in paid employment and at home. When a role leans heavily on that labour, it can be easy for organisations to talk about it as a personality trait rather than a professional skill.
Women at the front line, men still more likely to hold the purse strings
Look at who spends their working day inside the platforms and a clear picture emerges. Women are heavily present in titles like Social Media Manager, Community Manager, Content Lead and Creator. Many of the people teaching others how to grow reach, handle crises or use new features are women who have built their expertise in public. Men also hold social roles, and there are men who do excellent, under recognised social work, but the overall look of the discipline is not gender neutral.
Power in marketing does not sit only with the people posting. It sits where budgets, product decisions and channel strategy are set. In many organisations, those jobs still skew towards performance marketing, growth, product and commercial leadership. These tracks are more likely to be held by men, even as CMO titles in some markets now lean female. Studies of mid‑market business leadership put women at around a third of senior roles overall, lower than their share of the workforce. Marketing is an outlier in terms of visible female leadership, but the roles that hold the most direct influence over revenue and long term strategy are still not evenly shared.
The way social is positioned contributes to this. When the social team is treated primarily as a service that makes content and handles comments for other parts of the business, its leaders often sit a level or two below the people making big strategic calls. Their input into positioning and product is filtered through other functions. Their budgets are tied to campaign plans written elsewhere. In a discipline that leans female, that structural positioning has gendered effects even when nobody intends it.
The money: how it lands in social roles
Good, granular data on social media salaries by gender is still limited, but the wider marketing numbers give useful clues. The fact that women in UK marketing earn nearly a fifth less than men, on average, suggests that the parts of the discipline where women cluster are not being valued at the same level as the parts where men cluster. When you add the 35 percent gap reported in some martech and platform roles, you can see a divide between technical and data heavy jobs, and content and community work.
On the ground, this looks like social roles that bundle together multiple forms of labour without a corresponding uplift in pay. Content production, scheduling, moderation, customer support, influencer relations, reporting on performance and advising on crisis communications can all sit within one job description. The work spills into evenings and weekends whenever something takes off or goes wrong. Yet the role is often placed on the same band as an entry level marketing executive. The fact that many of the people holding those roles are women means they absorb the downside of that discount first.
Progression is another pressure point. While women have made real gains at CMO level, the most lucrative senior jobs that own growth, performance or product marketing remain harder to reach from a social background. It is still more common to see someone who has run paid search and CRM step into a VP of Growth title than someone who has led social and community. That is not because the latter lacks strategic ability. It is because the former sits closer, on paper, to revenue and targets that boards understand.
What is changing and what deserves celebration
There are also real wins to recognise, particularly on a day about women's achievements. The fact that women now hold a slight majority of CMO roles in some markets is a genuine milestone that would have been hard to imagine even a decade ago. At senior levels, some salary reports suggest women in director and above marketing roles are starting to match or outpace male peers, which hints at change once women make it into those upper bands.
Within social itself, there is a strong group of women who have used the visibility of the discipline to build influence, businesses and leadership roles. Many social media managers have gone on to become heads of brand, founders of agencies, independent consultants and trusted voices in the wider marketing industry. They have developed frameworks, playbooks and craft skills that turned social from "someone should post on Instagram" into a recognised marketing discipline.
There is also a growing push to define social careers more clearly. Career ladders, training, specialist tracks for strategy, community, creative and analytics, and conversations about boundaries and mental health are becoming more common. These changes are often driven by women who have experienced the strain of the role and want better conditions for the people coming up behind them.
Women in marketing
- Women hold a majority of marketing roles in several major markets and just over half of CMO positions at large advertisers.
- In the UK, the gender pay gap in marketing is around 18 percent, higher than the national median gap across all employees.
- In martech and related roles, one 2024 survey reported men earning about 35 percent more than women overall.
- At UK SEO agencies, women hold just over half of all jobs but only around a quarter of C‑suite roles. Their most common job title is "Account Manager", while the most common for men is "Managing Director".
Social and leadership
- Social media, content and community roles are heavily populated by women, while more technical and performance roles still skew male.
- On U.S. client‑side marketing teams, women now account for a majority of senior leaders and CMOs, which includes many who oversee significant social and digital budgets.
What this article is highlighting
- Men do work in social media and hold important roles in the discipline.
- The focus here is on the overall pattern: women are heavily represented in social roles, yet the way the work is valued and structured still does not fully reflect its importance.
- The piece aims to both lay out the facts and recognise the women who turned social into a serious, respected part of marketing.
What needs to happen next
If social media is to move from being women's work in the historical sense to being high value work that serves everyone fairly, a few shifts would make a real difference.
First, job design. Social roles need clear scope, realistic expectations and genuine decision making power. That includes transparent progression routes into broader marketing leadership rather than an endless loop of "more social".
Second, pay. Leaders can look at where social, content and community roles sit in their bands compared with other specialist functions that carry similar levels of risk and impact. If social is where reputational crises break, that risk should be reflected in the way the work is rewarded and resourced.
Third, emotional labour. Crisis response, moderation, culture watching and out of hours cover should be recognised as part of the job, shared across teams where possible and fairly compensated. It cannot rest silently on a few women who happen to be good at absorbing pressure.
Finally, access to power. Social practitioners should have routes into ownership of budgets, P&L responsibility and cross functional projects. That is good for the discipline and it is good for equality, because it opens leadership tracks to a group that is already diverse and highly skilled.
Social media became women's work in part because it followed familiar patterns about whose time and care are easiest to ask for. The women who have carried that work have built an essential part of modern marketing, often under conditions that did not match the importance of what they were doing. The opportunity now is to honour that contribution with structure, pay and progression that recognise social for what it is: serious work, central to how brands live in the world, and a place where women's leadership has already changed the industry for the better.

