Platforms

US lifts TikTok federal device ban after ownership deal closes, but agencies still decide

Written by Lucy Hall and reviewed, fact-checked and signed off by a SocialDay editor before publication. Read our editorial standards and corrections policy. Spotted something wrong? Tell the newsroom.

US lifts TikTok federal device ban after ownership deal closes, but agencies still decide

The US Justice Department announced on 17 July that TikTok's American-majority ownership structure eliminates the national security risks that led to the 2022 federal device ban. The DOJ lifted the ban after ByteDance transferred control of TikTok's US operations to a new joint venture called TikTok US Data Security (TikTok USDS), finalised in January.

The restructuring resulted in American investors owning 80.1% of TikTok USDS, while ByteDance retains a 19.9% stake. One of the new investors is Oracle, with tech company chairman Larry Ellison involved.

The reversal matters because it redefines what federal employees can legally do on government-issued devices and, by extension, changes the conversation about TikTok from blanket risk to negotiated governance. But it doesn't grant automatic access. Individual federal agencies still retain the power to decide whether to allow the app on official devices for internal reasons, such as productivity or work policies.

What the DOJ actually said

In a 12-page ruling, the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel explained that Congress banned only the version of TikTok that maintained proprietary conditions that raised security concerns, noting "Congress banned only the version of TikTok that shares the same problematic ownership characteristics".

The opinion, addressed to the deputy counsel to President Donald Trump, said the American-controlled version of TikTok "poses no such risk". The DOJ stated that the TikTok USDS Joint Venture "functions independently of ByteDance, is majority-owned by American investors, and has revised the content-recommendation algorithm and cybersecurity program originally developed by ByteDance to insulate federal government information against the concerning security features that initially motivated the prohibition".

80.1% American ownership of TikTok USDS TikTok US Data Security Joint Venture, January 2026

The deal, valued at roughly $14 billion, transfers TikTok's US business to the newly-formed joint venture led by US tech giant Oracle, US private equity firm Silver Lake, and UAE-backed investment firm MGX, with these three leading entities collectively holding a 50% stake.

In January, TikTok said the venture will retrain, test and update TikTok's content recommendation algorithm on US user data and the algorithm will be secured in Oracle's US cloud, with Oracle serving as one of the venture's three main investors.

Why 2022's ban happened in the first place

In late 2022, Congress passed bipartisan legislation, the No TikTok on Government Devices Act, which required executive branch agencies to remove TikTok from federal devices, signed into law by President Joe Biden on 29 December 2022.

The ban on downloading TikTok to government-owned devices was driven by fears that data from a ByteDance-owned social media app could end up in the hands of the Chinese government, and followed warnings from then FBI Director Chris Wray that China could collect user data through ByteDance.

Lawmakers argued that the platform's Chinese parent company, ByteDance, posed national security risks because China's intelligence and cybersecurity laws could compel data access or content manipulation.

The ban was part of a broader strategy. ByteDance's divestiture from TikTok was prompted by a 2024 law that passed with overwhelming bipartisan support in Congress, signed by President Joe Biden in April of that year, which required ByteDance to divest control of TikTok's US operations or risk having the app barred from US app stores and internet-hosting services.

What the ownership deal actually changes

The new structure was designed to satisfy the 2024 divestiture law. The deal satisfies the law requiring ByteDance to reduce its ownership below 20% or face a nationwide ban, with ByteDance now owning less than 20% of the new entity.

The majority American-owned Joint Venture will operate under defined safeguards that protect national security through comprehensive data protections, algorithm security, content moderation, and software assurances for US users.

Adam Presser, TikTok's former head of operations and trust and safety, leads the new US entity as CEO. The joint venture is overseen by a board that includes TikTok US CEO Shou Chew, Kenneth Glueck from Oracle, and representatives of investment firms including Susquehanna International Group, Silver Lake, and MGX.

Oracle, already a cloud infrastructure provider for TikTok, was designated the "security partner" responsible for overseeing data storage and access controls, while Silver Lake is a private equity firm with deep ties to US technology investments, and MGX is an Abu Dhabi-based fund, with the new entity operating independently from ByteDance's corporate structure though ByteDance remains a minority investor.

Congress banned only the version of TikTok that shares the same problematic ownership characteristics.

US Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel

Yet critical experts argue the risks haven't disappeared. Critics note that the Chinese government could still exert influence through ByteDance's remaining share, and that ByteDance's 19.9% stake still offers a potential channel for foreign influence.

Timothy Edgar, a Harvard Law lecturer and former privacy and civil liberties official in the White House National Security Staff, said "In my view, no, and, in some ways, it's made the problem even worse," arguing that privacy and security safeguards applied to TikTok prior to the sale now don't apply anymore, so those risks actually go up.

What it means for government agencies and marketers

The legal permission is narrow but symbolically significant. Federal employees can now install TikTok on government devices, but each agency retains discretion. President Donald Trump has cleared "employees of Executive Branch agencies" to "download TikTok onto their official devices, subject to the agency's discretion and consistent with all applicable workplace policies".

The DOJ opinion concluded "This conclusion only confers on agencies the discretion to permit employees to use TikTok USDS on their government devices; there is no mandate that agencies exercise that discretion in any particular way in any or all cases".

Some federal workers might still see a block if their agency decides the app does not fit workplace rules.

For social media marketers, the ruling is a signal change rather than a transformative one. Government agencies that previously avoided TikTok for compliance reasons now have a legal path to participate, if they choose. That opens the platform to a wider pool of official communications, public service campaigns, and recruitment efforts, fields where federal and state governments have historically lagged on newer platforms.

About 200 million Americans use TikTok, and government presence on the platform has already been tested by state and local bodies. Prior to the federal device ban, agencies including Wisconsin's Department of Natural Resources, the City of Minneapolis, and transport body Amtrak had built sizable followings by leaning into platform-native content rather than formal announcements.

The reversal doesn't guarantee a flood of federal TikTok accounts. It removes a legal barrier, but agencies must still weigh workforce management, content moderation, cybersecurity, and whether their missions align with the platform's culture. For brands and agencies marketing to government or working in regulated sectors, the shift is worth tracking. It suggests that regulatory concerns can be renegotiated through ownership structures rather than outright prohibition.

The bigger picture: platform risk, platform strategy

The TikTok device ban reversal is a data point in a larger conversation about how platforms, governments, and commercial interests intersect. For more than two years, marketers have operated in an environment where TikTok carried reputational and operational risk. Brands with government contracts, compliance-heavy industries, or conservative stakeholders avoided the platform or hedged their bets.

The January ownership deal and this July ruling shift the narrative from "TikTok is a national security threat" to "TikTok under American control is permissible." That changes how brands assess platform risk. It doesn't eliminate it, brands working with sensitive data or in regulated environments will still conduct due diligence, but it lowers the threshold for participation.

Lawmakers have pressed the venture for evidence that the new structure resolves the concerns behind the original ban, while two investors in Alphabet and Meta are suing the federal government over the deal's compliance with the divestiture law. The government has asked a court to dismiss that case, which remains pending.

For social media marketers, the lesson is broader than TikTok. Ownership matters. Algorithm governance matters. Where data lives and who controls it shapes regulatory outcomes. The reversal demonstrates that platform bans aren't necessarily permanent, and that commercial structures can be retrofitted to satisfy national security concerns, at least enough to reverse prior policy.

What hasn't changed

TikTok is still not on federal devices in practice at most agencies. The DOJ opinion creates legal permission, not operational mandate. Agencies that blocked TikTok for security, productivity, or policy reasons retain that discretion.

For brands, the commercial opportunity hasn't shifted overnight. Federal employees weren't a core TikTok demographic before the ban, and they won't become one immediately after the reversal. The ruling matters more for what it signals about regulatory trajectory than for immediate audience access.

Because the app successfully transitioned its US operations to an American-majority ownership group in January 2026, the federal ban has been permanently averted. The transition happened entirely on the backend, and the current app continues to update normally through the Apple and Google app stores.

What is now clear is that TikTok's future in the US is no longer a binary question of banned or not banned. It's a negotiated settlement where ownership, oversight, and data governance have been restructured to meet minimum regulatory standards. Whether that holds, legally, commercially, and politically, remains the story social media marketers will track for the next several years.